Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1996;87:621-626
© 1996 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hartmann, K.
Right arrow Articles by Koch, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hartmann, K.
Right arrow Articles by Koch, M.

Articles

A randomized controlled trial of smoking cessation intervention in pregnancy in an academic clinic

KE Hartmann, Thorp JM Jr, L Pahel-Short, and MA Koch

To evaluate the effectiveness of a physician-based intervention to promote smoking cessation during pregnancy, we conducted this randomized controlled trial in the resident-staffed prenatal clinics at the University of North Carolina Women's Hospital . Two hundred fifty prenatal patients who smoked were enrolled at their first visit and randomly assigned to the intervention or the usual-care group. Resident physicians provided self-help materials to intervention subjects and used a script to set goals with them at each prenatal visit. Subjects who set quit dates were contacted by volunteer cessation counselors. To verify smoking status, subjects provided a self-report and breath carbon monoxide (CO) sample at each visit. Controls were similarly assessed at enrollment and at three additional predetermined intervals. Twenty percent of intervention subjects and 10% of controls reported cessation, which was verified by CO level (P = .052). Fifty-one percent of subjects reduced their consumption by half or more, compared with 30% of controls (P = .002). The intervention is effective in promoting smoking cessation and reduction. In addition, this technique is inexpensive, readily accepted by staff, and efficient.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
W. Pan
Proactive telephone counseling as an adjunct to minimal intervention for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis
Health Educ. Res., July 1, 2006; 21(3): 416 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. S. Gorin and J. E. Heck
Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Tobacco Counseling by Health Care Providers
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2004; 13(12): 2012 - 2022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
C. M. McBride, K. M. Emmons, and I. M. Lipkus
Understanding the potential of teachable moments: the case of smoking cessation
Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2003; 18(2): 156 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
R. H. Secker-Walker and P. M. Vacek
Infant Birth Weight as a Measure of Harm Reduction During Smoking Cessation Trials in Pregnancy
Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2002; 29(5): 557 - 569.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
P. M. Ling and S. A. Glantz
Why and How the Tobacco Industry Sells Cigarettes to Young Adults: Evidence From Industry Documents
Am J Public Health, June 1, 2002; 92(6): 908 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
P. Dolan-Mullen, C. C DiClemente, M. M Velasquez, S. C Timpson, J. Y Groff, J. P Carbonari, and L. Nicol
Enhanced prenatal case management for low income smokers
Tob. Control, September 1, 2000; 9(90003): 75i - 77.
[Full Text]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
C. L Melvin, P. Dolan-Mullen, R. A Windsor, H P. Whiteside Jr, and R. L Goldenberg
Recommended cessation counselling for pregnant women who smoke: a review of the evidence
Tob. Control, September 1, 2000; 9(90003): 80i - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
R. A. Windsor, C. Q. Li, N. R. Boyd Jr., and K. E. Hartmann
The Use of Significant Reduction Rates to Evaluate Health Education Methods for Pregnant Smokers: A New Harm Reduction Behavioral Indicator?
Health Educ Behav, October 1, 1999; 26(5): 648 - 662.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
E. C. Becher and N. A. Christakis
Firearm Injury Prevention Counseling: Are We Missing the Mark?
Pediatrics, September 1, 1999; 104(3): 530 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.