Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1996;87:581-587
© 1996 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loret de Mola,
Right arrow Articles by Friedlander, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loret de Mola, , JR
Right arrow Articles by Friedlander, M.

Articles

Elevated interleukin-6 levels in the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: ovarian immunohistochemical localization of interleukin-6 signal

Loret de Mola JR, JP Flores, GP Baumgardner, JM Goldfarb, V Gindlesperger, and MA Friedlander

OBJECTIVE: To examine the production and immunolocalization of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in patients with the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. METHODS: The study group consisted of patients with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (n = 9) from whom serum and ascites samples were obtained. The control samples used were serum (n = 10) and peritoneal (n = 16) and follicular fluids (n = 8) from healthy individuals. Follicular fluid (n = 40) and serial serum samples were also obtained from patients undergoing menotropin stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) before (n = 10) and after ovulation (n = 34). Interleukin-6 measurements were performed with a sensitive immunoassay and confirmed with a bioassay. Immunohistochemical localization of IL-6 was performed with a mouse monoclonal antibody in normal premenopausal (n = 5) and postmenopausal ovaries (n = 5), as well as with cells from stimulated follicular fluid aspirates (n = 3). RESULTS: We found significantly higher serum and ascites IL-6 levels in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (mean 18.8 +/- 1.1 and 810.8 +/- 60.7 pg/mL, respectively) compared with postovulatory serum and peritoneal fluid from normal controls (mean 4.4 +/- .69 and 44.7 +/- 7.5 pg/mL, respectively) (P < .001) or serum after menotropin stimulation (13.1 +/- 1.1 pg/mL) (P < .001). At the time of ovulation, follicular fluid IL-6 levels (normal controls, mean 9 +/- 2.1 pg/mL; menotropin stimulation, mean 10.1 +/- 4 pg/mL) were higher than in preovulatory serum (normal controls, mean 4.5 +/- .8 pg/mL; menotropin stimulation, mean 6.3 +/- 1.4 pg/mL) (P < .001). Immunohistochemical localization of IL-6 revealed intense staining in corpora lutea and theca cells from large antral follicles and luteinized granulosa cells in follicular aspirates after menotropin stimulation. CONCLUSION: Interleukin-6 levels are markedly elevated in the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome when compared with controls. The higher follicular fluid IL-6 levels seen suggest local secretion of this cytokine. Immunohistochemical correlation demonstrated IL-6 within ovarian theca cells. These findings suggest a local role for IL-6 both in normal and stimulated ovarian function. Whether IL-6 is directly responsible for the clinical manifestations of this syndrome is unclear. However, when produced in massive amounts, the pro-inflammatory effects of IL-6 may contribute to its pathogenesis and perhaps serve as a marker for the disease.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
R. Wu, K. H. Van der Hoek, N. K. Ryan, R. J. Norman, and R. L. Robker
Macrophage contributions to ovarian function
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2004; 10(2): 119 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
C. Albert, N. Garrido, A. Mercader, C.V. Rao, J. Remohi, C. Simon, and A. Pellicer
The role of endothelial cells in the pathogenesis of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 8(5): 409 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T.G. Gul, C. Posaci, and S. Caliskan
The role of enalapril in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a rabbit model
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2253 - 2257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.R. Loret de Mola and S. Friedler
Pathophysiology of unilateral pleural effusions in the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 1999; 14(1): 272 - 273.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
R. Orvieto and Z. Ben-Rafael
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: A New Insight Into an Old Enigma
Reproductive Sciences, May 1, 1998; 5(3): 110 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.