Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1996;87:575-580
© 1996 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elam-Evans, L.
Right arrow Articles by Marks, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elam-Evans, L.
Right arrow Articles by Marks, J.

Articles

Trends in the percentage of women who received no prenatal care in the United States, 1980-1992: contributions of the demographic and risk effects

LD Elam-Evans, MM Adams, PM Gargiullo, JL Kiely, and JS Marks

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the increase in the percentage of women who received no prenatal care in the United States relative to 1980 (from 1.3% in 1980 to 2.2% in 1989 and 1.7% in 1992) was due to increasing risks of no care in subgroups of women or increasing percentages of births to women at high demographic risk of no care. METHODS: We analyzed U.S. birth certificates for the period 1980-1992. The annual adjusted odds of no prenatal care relative to 1980 were computed by logistic regression models that included year, maternal characteristics, and interactions of these characteristics with year. We also examined changes in the annual distributions of births by maternal characteristics. RESULTS: The risk of no prenatal care in most subgroups increased during the early 1980s, peaked in the late 1980s, and declined thereafter. For example, among black women, the adjusted risk of no care more than doubled from 1980 to 1989. Throughout the 1980s and into the 1990s, the percentage of births to women at high demographic risk of no care increased. This increase in the percentage of births to women at high demographic risk shows no sign of abating. CONCLUSIONS: During the 1980s, increasing risks in subgroups of women drove the increase in the crude rate of no prenatal care. Despite decreases in the risks of no care in the early 1990s, increasing percentages of births to women with high demographic risk for no care prevented a decrease in the crude rate to the 1980 level.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
T. Block, E. Munson, A. Culver, K. Vaughan, and J. E. Hryciuk
Comparison of Carrot Broth- and Selective Todd-Hewitt Broth-Enhanced PCR Protocols for Real-Time Detection of Streptococcus agalactiae in Prenatal Vaginal/Anorectal Specimens
J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2008; 46(11): 3615 - 3620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. F. Saftlas, L. M. Koonin, and H. K. Atrash
Racial Disparity in Pregnancy-related Mortality Associated with Livebirth: Can Established Risk Factors Explain It?
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 1, 2000; 152(5): 413 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.