Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1996;87:511-514
© 1996 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lipitz, S
Right arrow Articles by Reichman, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lipitz, S
Right arrow Articles by Reichman, B

Articles

Outcome of twin pregnancies reduced from triplets compared with nonreduced twin gestations

S Lipitz, J Uval, R Achiron, E Schiff, A Lusky, and B Reichman

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of triplet pregnancies reduced to twins who reached 24 weeks' gestation with the outcome of twin pregnancies managed in the same perinatal department. METHODS: The study group included 43 triplet pregnancies reduced to twins who reached 24 weeks' gestation and were delivered between January 1989 and December 1993. The complications and outcomes of these pregnancies were compared with all 134 bichorionic twin pregnancies delivered during 1993. RESULTS: In general, the outcome of triplet pregnancies reduced to twins was not significantly different from that of twin pregnancies. Both pregnancy-induced hypertension and premature contractions were similar in the two groups. The higher incidence of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) in the reduced cases compared with nonintervention twins (18.6 versus 8.2%) was of borderline significance (relative risk [RR] 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-5.27). Although premature delivery occurred in 30% of patients in both groups, 20.9% of patients in the reduction group delivered before 35 weeks' gestation, compared with 10.4% in the nonintervention group (RR 2.0, 95% CI 0.93-4.30). The mean gestational age was similar in the two groups, as was the risk of low birth weight and respiratory disorders. Differences in the proportion of patients with PROM, low gestation duration, and very low birth weight, although not quite statistically significant, are probably because of the relatively small numbers and, hence, of low power (50-55%), but may be of clinical importance. CONCLUSION: The outcome of triplet pregnancies reduced to twins did not differ substantially from that of nonreduced twin pregnancies.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. D. Lambert
Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: The children of assisted reproduction confront the responsible conduct of assisted reproductive technologies
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3011 - 3015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Bergh, A. Moller, L. Nilsson, and M. Wikland
Obstetric outcome and psychological follow-up of pregnancies after embryo reduction
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 1999; 14(8): 2170 - 2175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.