Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1996;87:410-413
© 1996 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hagay, Z
Right arrow Articles by Insler, V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hagay, Z
Right arrow Articles by Insler, V

Articles

Uriscreen, a rapid enzymatic urine screening test: useful predictor of significant bacteriuria in pregnancy

Z Hagay, R Levy, A Miskin, D Milman, H Sharabi, and V Insler

OBJECTIVE: To establish the reliability of a new rapid enzymatic screening test, the Uriscreen, in the detection of significant bacteriuria in pregnancy. METHODS: During a 6-month period, from July 1 to December 30, 1993, 313 consecutive pregnant patients were evaluated. Randomly voided, midstream, clean-catch urine specimens were used. Each sample was tested by routine laboratory culture and four rapid screening tests: the nitrite and leukocyte esterase dipstick, microscopic examination for pyuria, and the Uriscreen test. Results of the four rapid tests were compared with those of the urine culture. RESULTS: Twenty-four women (7.6%) had urine culture results indicating significant bacteriuria. The sensitivity of the nitrite test, the leukocyte esterase test, and a microscopic examination for pyuria was low (37, 52, and 56%, respectively). The Uriscreen test showed very high sensitivity (100%), lower specificity (81%), a high predictive value of negative results (100%), and a low positive predictive value (30%). CONCLUSIONS: The Uriscreen test is a reliable alternative to culture screening of all pregnant patients. A policy of performing a urine culture during pregnancy only on patients with a positive Uriscreen test will save as much as 80% of unnecessary cultures.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
R. J. Teppa and J. M. Roberts
The Uriscreen Test to Detect Significant A symptomatic Bacteriuria During Pregnancy
Reproductive Sciences, January 1, 2005; 12(1): 50 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
L. MILLAR, L. DEBUQUE, C. LEIALOHA, A. GRANDINETTI, and J. KILLEEN
Rapid Enzymatic Urine Screening Test to Detect Bacteriuria in Pregnancy
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2000; 95(4): 601 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.