Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1996;87:30-34
© 1996 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hurst, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hurst, N.

Articles

Lactation after augmentation mammoplasty

NM Hurst

OBJECTIVE: To compare the lactation outcomes of breast-augmented women and nonaugmented women. METHODS: This study used a retrospective, comparative design. Demographic and descriptive data were obtained from client records maintained by a lactation support program at a large children's hospital in the southwest United States. The association between breast augmentation and lactation outcome in the two groups was investigated by obtaining data from these existing records. RESULTS: A significantly greater incidence of lactation insufficiency was found in augmented women compared with nonaugmented women (P < .001). Among 42 augmented women, 27 (64%) had insufficient lactation, compared with only three (less than 7%) of the 42 nonaugmented women. Augmented women who experienced sufficient lactation were equivalent in age, ethnicity, type of delivery, smoking, previous breast-feeding experience, and lactation course compared to augmented women with lactation insufficiency. However, the type of breast incision was significantly associated with lactation outcome. More specifically, it was the periareolar approach that was most significantly associated with lactation insufficiency (P < .01). The incidence of lactation insufficiency with the submammary-axillary approach was only statistically significant when compared with nonaugmented women. CONCLUSION: A significantly greater incidence of insufficient lactation was found among augmented women compared with nonaugmented women. The periareolar approach was most significantly associated with lactation insufficiency.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
L. Nommsen-Rivers
Cosmetic Breast Surgery--is Breastfeeding at Risk?
J Hum Lact, February 1, 2003; 19(1): 7 - 8.
[PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
Breastfeeding After Breast Augmentation
J Hum Lact, February 1, 2003; 19(1): 70 - 71.
[PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
K. L. Hoover, L. H. Barbalinardo, and M. P. Platia
Delayed Lactogenesis II Secondary to Gestational Ovarian Theca Lutein Cysts in Two Normal Singleton Pregnancies
J Hum Lact, August 1, 2002; 18(3): 264 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.