Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1995;86:108-111
© 1995 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Barclay, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Barclay, M.

Articles

A computer model of uterine contractions based on discrete contractile elements

HF Andersen and ML Barclay

OBJECTIVE: To predict uterine contraction waveforms using a microcomputer-based model of uterine activity based on discrete contractile elements, varying the shape of the model, total number of cells, and pacemaker locations. METHODS: The model is a hollow ovoid composed of discrete contractile elements (cells) that propagate electrical impulses, generate tension, and have defined contracting and refractory periods. Each cell contacts eight surrounding cells and propagates impulses iteratively from cell to cell. Contraction pressure is the sum of the tension contributions by contracting cells. Sample contraction waveforms were generated based on various numbers of cells organized in ovoids with long:short axis ratios of 1:1, 3:2, and 2:1, with one or two pacemakers at varying positions. RESULTS: Contraction waveforms are altered by altering the shape of the matrix, but not by increasing the number of contractile elements. The vertical placement of the pacemaker has a dramatic effect on the shape and symmetry of contractions, including the development of patterns characteristic of "dysfunctional" uterine contractions. CONCLUSION: Abnormal uterine contraction patterns may result from pacemaker activity in unusual locations, such as mid-uterus. Further refinement of this computer model of uterine activity may contribute to a better understanding of the genesis of normal and abnormal intrauterine pressure waveforms and their relationship to the progress of labor.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
L. Bursztyn, O. Eytan, A. J. Jaffa, and D. Elad
Mathematical model of excitation-contraction in a uterine smooth muscle cell
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): C1816 - C1829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
R. C. YOUNG and R. O. HESSION
Three-Dimensional Structure of the Smooth Muscle in the Term-Pregnant Human Uterus
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 1999; 93(1): 94 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.