|
|
||||||||
Articles |
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the obstetric outcome of patients who have had more than one previous cesarean delivery, and to compare it with that of patients with one previous cesarean. METHODS: Medical records of 435 women with more than one previous cesarean and 1206 with one previous cesarean, and who delivered at our institution in the period 1987-1991, were reviewed retrospectively. All adverse outcomes related to uterine wound separation identified in medical records were reviewed individually. Statistical analysis of outcome used chi 2 test, Fisher exact test, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Uterine wound separation occurred in nine of 435 patients with more than one previous cesarean compared with 16 of 1206 with a single previous cesarean (2.1 versus 1.3%, not significant). Of those undergoing a trial of labor, separations occurred in six of 302 and 12 of 1110 patients with more than one and a single previous operation, respectively (2.0 versus 1.1%, not significant). Vaginal birth after cesarean was successful less often in women with more than one previous cesarean than in those with one previous operation (64 versus 77%, P < .05). Important adverse outcomes were infrequent and not related to the number of previous cesareans. CONCLUSION: Our findings support allowing a trial of labor for patients with more than one previous cesarean delivery under conditions that permit prompt recognition and treatment of emergencies.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. B. Landon, C. Y. Spong, E. Thom, J. C. Hauth, S. L. Bloom, M. W. Varner, A. H. Moawad, S. N. Caritis, M. Harper, R. J. Wapner, et al. Risk of Uterine Rupture With a Trial of Labor in Women With Multiple and Single Prior Cesarean Delivery. Obstet. Gynecol., July 1, 2006; 108(1): 12 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gonen, V. Nisenblat, S. Barak, A. Tamir, and G. Ohel Results of a Well-Defined Protocol for a Trial of Labor After Prior Cesarean Delivery Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2006; 107(2): 240 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Kieser and T. F. Baskett A 10-Year Population-Based Study of Uterine Rupture Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2002; 100(4): 749 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. SHIPP, C. M. ZELOP, J. T. REPKE, A. COHEN, A. B. CAUGHEY, and E. LIEBERMAN Intrapartum Uterine Rupture and Dehiscence in Patients With Prior Lower Uterine Segment Vertical and Transverse Incisions Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 1999; 94(5): 735 - 740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |