Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1995;85:570-572
© 1995 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parilla, B.
Right arrow Articles by Sabbagha, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parilla, B.
Right arrow Articles by Sabbagha, R.

Articles

The clinical significance of a single umbilical artery as an isolated finding on prenatal ultrasound

BV Parilla, RK Tamura, SN MacGregor, LJ Geibel, and RE Sabbagha

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perinatal outcome in fetuses with single umbilical artery detected on targeted prenatal ultrasound without other anomalies. METHODS: During a 3.5-year period, an isolated single umbilical artery was suspected on prenatal ultrasound examination in 57 fetuses evaluated at two referral centers. Targeted imaging to rule out concurrent fetal anomalies was normal in all cases. Pregnancy and perinatal outcome data were retrieved by review of the medical records or from conversations with referring physicians. Complete follow-up was available in 50 cases. RESULTS: A two-vessel umbilical cord was confirmed at birth in 50 neonates. The mean gestational age at delivery was 38.6 +/- 2.8 weeks; the mean birth weight was 3202.8 +/- 835.8 g. Seventeen patients (34%) underwent genetic amniocentesis, and all fetuses had a normal karyotype. The only neonate ascertained to have a congenital anomaly after birth was diagnosed with total anomalous pulmonary venous return. This neonate underwent a corrective surgical procedure and is thriving with no apparent problems at 3.5 years of age. There were no perinatal deaths. CONCLUSION: In the absence of additional sonographically detectable anomalies, an isolated single umbilical artery does not seem to affect clinical outcome and therefore should not alter routine obstetric management.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
D. R. Gossett, M. E. Lantz, and C. A. Chisholm
Antenatal Diagnosis of Single Umbilical Artery: Is Fetal Echocardiography Warranted?
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2002; 100(5): 903 - 908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
L. M. Hill, D. Wibner, P. Gonzales, and P. Chenevey
Validity of Transabdominal Sonography in the Detection of a Two-Vessel Umbilical Cord
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2001; 98(5): 837 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.