Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1995;85:440-443
© 1995 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gigante, J
Right arrow Articles by Oquist, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gigante, J
Right arrow Articles by Oquist, N.

Articles

Universal screening for group B streptococcus: recommendations and obstetricians' practice decisions

J Gigante, GB Hickson, SS Entman, and NL Oquist

OBJECTIVE: To determine how obstetricians' opinions regarding universal screening of pregnant women for group B streptococcus (GBS) and their responses to positive culture results vary from American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations, and to determine the physician characteristics that predict divergent opinions. METHODS: One hundred ninety-four practicing obstetricians in the middle Tennessee region were queried by a mail survey. They were asked if they agreed with universal screening for GBS and to indicate whether they would prescribe antibiotics for women in labor, represented by six scenarios that differed with respect to presence or absence of preterm labor, premature rupture of membranes (ROM), prolonged ROM, and a positive GBS cervical culture. They were also asked to describe their practice and personality characteristics. RESULTS: Completed surveys were returned by 135 of 194 obstetricians (70%). Although only 28% of the respondents agreed with routine prenatal screening for GBS, most (74%) said they would treat a patient on the basis of a positive culture alone. Other risk factors, when added to a positive culture, slightly increased the decision to treat (from 74 to 88%). Multiple logistic regression, used to assess the relative effect of clinical and physician characteristics on treatment decisions, revealed that chemoprophylaxis for GBS was predicted most strongly by a positive culture at 28 weeks' gestation followed by prolonged ROM and preterm labor. Practicing in an urban location and seeing fewer than 20 patients per day also influenced the decision to treat. CONCLUSION: Although most obstetricians in the middle Tennessee region do not believe in universal screening, most will prescribe intrapartum antibiotics on the basis of a positive screening culture. However, other clinical risk factors and physician characteristics significantly and independently affect the decision to treat as well.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
H. D. Davies, C. E. Adair, A. Schuchat, D. E. Low, R. S. Sauve, and A. McGeer
Physicians' prevention practices and incidence of neonatal group B streptococcal disease in 2 Canadian regions
Can. Med. Assoc. J., February 1, 2001; 164(4): 479 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
A. Schuchat
Epidemiology of Group B Streptococcal Disease in the United States: Shifting Paradigms
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 1998; 11(3): 497 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
S. R. Allen
Management of Asymptomatic Term Neonates Whose Mothers Received Intrapartum Antibiotics Part-1: Rationale for ltrapartum Antibiotic Therapy
Clinical Pediatrics, October 1, 1997; 36(10): 563 - 568.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.