Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1992;80:48-51
© 1992 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HURD, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by PEARL, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HURD, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by PEARL, M. L.

The Relationship of the Umbilicus to the Aortic Bifurcation: Implications for Laparoscopic Technique

WILLIAM W. HURD, MD, RONALD O. BUDE, MD, JOHN O. L. DeLANCEY, MD and MICHAEL L. PEARL, MD

From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Abstract

objective: We evaluated the location of the umbilicus relative to the aortic bifurcation and the left common iliac vein where it crosses the midline.

Methods: Abdominal computed tomography images from 35 reproductive-age women were retrospectively reviewed to determine the location of the umbilicus. The results were correlated with body mass index using Pearson correlation coefficient and a two-tailed paired t test.

Results: The location of the umbilicus, but not the aortic bifurcation, was more caudal in heavier women and negatively correlated with body mass index. In nonobese women, the mean location of the umbilicus was 0.4 cm caudal to the aortic bifurcation, and was at or cephalad to the bifurcation in eight of 15 (53%). In overweight women, the mean umbilical location was 2.4 cm caudal to the bifurcation, and in obese women, 2.9 cm caudal to the bifurcation. In these last two groups of subjects, the umbilicus was located at the level of the bifurcation in six of 20 (30%). In every case, the umbilicus was located cephalad to where the common iliac vein crossed the midline.

Conclusions: The umbilicus is often located at or cephalad to the aortic bifurcation, and consistently located cephalad to where the left common iliac vein crosses the midline. The laparoscopic approach should take these relationships into account to minimize injuries to major retroperitoneal vessels.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Leonard, A. Fotso, B. Borghese, N. Chopin, H. Foulot, and C. Chapron
Ureteral complications from laparoscopic hysterectomy indicated for benign uterine pathologies: a 13-year experience in a continuous series of 1300 patients
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 2006 - 2011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
C. H. NEZHAT, F. NEZHAT, A. I. BRILL, and C. NEZHAT
Normal Variations of Abdominal and Pelvic Anatomy Evaluated at Laparoscopy
Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 1999; 94(2): 238 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.