Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1992;79:670-672
© 1992 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PERRYMAN, D.
Right arrow Articles by HOLST, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PERRYMAN, D.
Right arrow Articles by HOLST, V.

Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Study Comparing Prostaglandin E2 Gel to Prostaglandin E2 Suppositories

DOUGLAS PERRYMAN, MD, JOHN D. YEAST, MD and VICKY HOLST, RPh

From St. Luke's Perinatal Center, St. Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri

Abstract

Prostaglandin (PG) E2 has proven effective in many studies as a pie-induction agent for cervical ripening. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a 5-mg dose of PGE2 prepared gel with that of a quartered PGE2 20-mg suppository. Previous studies have documented uniform distribution of PGE2 in the suppository. After 90 patients entered the study, there appeared to be an unacceptable rate of hyperstimulation following the induction dose using the suppository. The study was discontinued, and data analysis revealed a 24% hyperstimulation rate with the quartered suppository versus 0% with the gel. The successful vaginal delivery rates were equivalent, at 75% for the gel and 66% for the suppository. The 5-mg quartered suppository appeared to initiate an unacceptable amount of uterine activity, much greater than with the 5-mg gel dose.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
PROSTAGLANDIN FOR CERVICAL RIPENING: GEL VERSUS SUPPOSITORY
Journal Watch (General), May 12, 1992; 1992(512): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.