Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1992;79:561-563
© 1992 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BERNSTEIN, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by CATALANO, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BERNSTEIN, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by CATALANO, P. M.

Influence of Fetal Fat on the Ultrasound Estimation of Fetal Weight in Diabetic Mothers

IRA M. BERNSTEIN, MD and PATRICK M. CATALANO, MD

From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont

Abstract

Currently available formulas for the estimation of fetal weight assume uniform density of tissue. Because fat tissue is less dense than lean body mass, we hypothesized that the sonographic overestimation of fetal weight in infants of diabetic mothers is the consequence of an elevated proportion of body fat, resulting in a lower body density. We prospectively examined 52 children of diabetic mothers. Each had ultrasound estimation of fetal weight within 7 days of delivery and estimates of neonatal body composition made from anthropometric evaluation within 48 hours of birth. Ultrasound estimates of fetal weight were considered acceptable if they were within 10% of actual birth weight. There was no difference in mean birth weight between those overestimated (N=22) and those underestimated (AT=8). The sum of skinfolds from two sites, the ponderal index, and percent body fat were all significantly greater in the neonates with sonographic overestimation of fetal weight. Lean body mass was significantly greater (P<.05) in infants whose sonograms underestimated birth weight. When all subjects were included, a significant correlation was found between the degree of error in the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight and the ponderal index (r=0.40, P<.01), the sum of the skinfold measurements (r=0.29, P<.05), and the percent body fat (r=0.28, P<.05). These data suggest that increased body fat in infants of diabetic mothers is associated with sonographic overestimation of fetal weight.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. Hod and Y. Yogev
Goals of Metabolic Management of Gestational Diabetes: Is it all about the sugar?
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2007; 30(Supplement_2): S180 - S187.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes Spectr.Home page
J. D.L. Dupak and A. L. Trujillo
Ultrasound Surveillance in Pregnancy Complicated by Diabetes
Diabetes Spectr, April 1, 2007; 20(2): 89 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
T. L. Rasmussen
The Use of Ultrasound to Identify Fetuses with Macrosoomia in Diabetic Pregnancies: A Review of Current Literature
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 2000; 16(2): 76 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.