Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1992;79:7-13
© 1992 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ANDREWS, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by HAMPP, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ANDREWS, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by HAMPP, S.

Acyclovir in Pregnancy Registry: Six Years' Experience

ELIZABETH B. ANDREWS, PhD., BONNIE C. YANKASKAS, PhD., JOSÉ F. CORDERO, MD,MPH., KATHERINE SCHOEFFLER and SHARON HAMPP, RN.

From Burroughs Wellcome Co., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; and the Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgin

Abstract

The Acyclovir in Pregnancy Registry was established to gather data on prenatal exposure to acyclovir. Exposed pregnancies are tracked prospectively to ascertain exposure, risk factors, and pregnancy outcome. Through June 30,1990, 312 acyclovir-exposed pregnancies had been reported and followed. Of these, 239 were exposed during the first trimester; outcomes included 24 spontaneous fetal losses, 47 induced abortions, 159 live births of infants without congenital abnormalities, and nine outcomes with congenital abnormalities. Among the 73 second- and third-trimester exposures, one infant was born with an abnormality. Exposures are also reported to the registry retrospectively, ie, after the outcome of pregnancy is known. Registry findings to date do not show an increase in the number of birth defects among the prospective reports when compared with that expected in the general population, and there is no consistent pattern of abnormalities among retrospective or prospective reports. These findings should provide some reassurance in counseling women following inadvertent prenatal exposure. The cases accumulated to date represent a sample of insufficient size for reaching reliable and definitive conclusions about the safety of acyclovir for pregnant women and their developing fetuses. Therefore, until further information is available, the Acyclovir in Pregnancy Registry Advisory Committee recommends following the 1989 Centers for Disease Control Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines for the use of acyclovir in pregnancy, and encourages reporting of all prenatal exposures to the registry (1-800-722-9292, ext. 8465).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DTBHome page
Chickenpox, pregnancy and the newborn
DTB, September 1, 2005; 43(9): 69 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
L. B. Holmes, D. F. Wyszynski, and E. Lieberman
The AED (Antiepileptic Drug) Pregnancy Registry: A 6-Year Experience
Arch Neurol, May 1, 2004; 61(5): 673 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. D. Brown, M. G. Bartlett, and C. A. White
Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Acyclovir, Zidovudine, and Acyclovir-Zidovudine in Pregnant Rats
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2003; 47(3): 991 - 996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Lessan-Pezeshki
Pregnancy after renal transplantation: points to consider
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 703 - 707.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
O. Dupuis, F. Audibert, H. Fernandez, and R. Frydman
HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS ENCEPHALITIS IN PREGNANCY
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 1999; 94(5): 810 - 812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
PREGNANCY OUTCOMES AFTER ACYCLOVIR EXPOSURE
Journal Watch (General), January 17, 1992; 1992(117): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.