Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Obstetrics & Gynecology 1990;75:483-485
© 1990 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uribe, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Buttram, V. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Uribe, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Buttram, V. C., Jr

TUBAL PREGNANCY WITH NORMAL HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAM AND NEGATIVE SERUM PREGNANCY TEST

Marco A. Uribe, MD, Randall C. Dunn, MD and Veasy C. Buttram, Jr, MD

From the Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, Texas

Abstract

A patient undergoing evaluation for primary infertility with regular menses had a normal hysterosalpingogram in the follicular phase and underwent diagnostic laparoscopy the next day, with the finding of a tubal pregnancy. The patient had a negative serum pregnancy test. Although a normal hysterosalpingogram and negative serum pregnancy test are each rare with a tubal pregnancy, the combination of the two occurring in a tubal pregnancy is previously unreported and did not exclude the diagnosis in this case.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.