Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1989;74:962-966
© 1989 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lorenz, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Chik, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lorenz, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Chik, L.

SURVEY OF MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE SUBSPECIALISTS: PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES, JOB SETTING, AND SATISFACTION

Robert P. Lorenz, MD, Robert J. Sokol, MD and Lawrence Chik, PhD

From the Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak; and Hutzel Hospital, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan

We analyzed the job setting, professional activities, and satisfaction of subspecialists in maternal-fetal medicine. A two-page questionnaire was mailed to all members of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The results were analyzed by multiple regression and multivariate analysis. Of 603 questionnaires mailed, 496 (80%) were returned; 70% of all certified maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists responded. The job setting of respondents was university hospital-based faculty in 66%, community hospital-based salaried in 15%, private practice in 10%, and other in 9%. The average percent of professional time devoted to each area was as follows: clinical work, 57% of all professional time; research, 18%; administrative, 15%; and educational, 11%. Time distribution, volume of hysterectomies, and number of peer-review publications were the only significant differences among job settings. For university hospital-based faculty, the time distribution was 50% clinical, 23% research, 16% administrative, and 11% educational. For community hospital-based salaried physicians, it was 63% clinical, 10% research, 16% administrative, and 11% educational; for private practice, it was 84% clinical, 7% research, 5% administrative, and 6% educational. Types of activities of maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists included ultrasound (75% of respondents, mean 436 studies per year), gynecologic procedures (71% of subspecialists, volume of 8.7 hysterectomies per year), genetic procedures (83%; 125 procedures per year), research (87%), recent peer-review publications (80%), grants (40%), and medicolegal reviews (64%). Ninety-five percent had a medical-school faculty appointment. Job satisfaction was high (mean 7.3 on a scale of 10). Multivariate analysis of job satisfaction (R =0.53, or explained variance =27%) revealed ten correlates of satisfaction. Job satisfaction was not correlated with age, sex, job setting, or time distribution. This survey reveals a pattern of busy, satisfied clinicians active in administrative and educational roles while usually continuing both research and gynecologic practice.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
D. A. Wing and E. J. Quilligan
Fellowship Training: The Ever-Changing Subspecialty of Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2008; 112(6): 1288 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.