Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1989;74:640-643
© 1989 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GILBERT, L.
Right arrow Articles by SHARP, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GILBERT, L.
Right arrow Articles by SHARP, F.

Hemostasis and Cold Knife Cone Biopsy

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing a Suture Versus Non-Suture Technique

L. GILBERT, MBBS, MRCOG, N. J. St., G. SAUNDERS, MBChB, MRCOG, FRCS Ed, R. STRINGER, FRCOG and F. SHARP, MD, FRCOG

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Clinical Sciences Centre, The Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, England.

Two methods of obtaining hemostasis after cold knife cone biopsy were compared in a prospective randomized trial involving 200 patients. One method relied primarily on hemostatic sutures, and the other involved the use of a styptic solution (Monsel's solution) and vaginal pack, thus avoiding the use of sutures altogether. The short-and long-term morbidity in these two groups were compared and 12-month follow-up was completed. The use of sutures did not reduce the incidence of primary hemorrhage. Secondary hemorrhage was twice as frequent in the suture group, although this trend did not quite reach statistical significance. During long-term follow-up, significantly more patients in the suture group developed menstrual symptoms, cervical stenosis, and unsatisfactory colposcopy, requiring further operative intervention as a result.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
F. S. Billingsley and A. A. Kamat
Superiority of Electrocautery Over the Suture Method for Achieving Cervical Cone-Bed Hemostasis
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2004; 103(2): 401 - 402.
[Full Text]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. A. Kamat, P. Kramer, and A. P. Soisson
Superiority of Electrocautery Over the Suture Method for Achieving Cervical Cone Bed Hemostasis
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2003; 102(4): 726 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
E. J. SUH-BURGMANN, D. WHALL-STROJWAS, Y. CHANG, D. HUNDLEY, and A. GOODMAN
Risk Factors for Cervical Stenosis After Loop Electrocautery Excision Procedure
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2000; 96(5): 657 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.