Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1989;74:600-603
© 1989 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRAY, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by CRANE, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GRAY, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by CRANE, J. P.

Cephalic Index

A Gestational Age-Dependent Biometric Parameter

DIANA L. GRAY, MD, GIULIANA S. SONGSTER, MD, CURTIS A. PARVIN, PhD and JAMES P. CRANE, MD

From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, The Jewish Hospital of St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

Cephalic index was proposed originally as a means of recognizing altered head shape and confirming the validity of biparietal diameter (BPD) measurements. Two previous studies found cephalic index to be gestational age-independent. We tested this relationship by regression analysis in 777 well-dated pregnancies, evenly distributed between 14–40 weeks' gestation. Significant variation in cephalic index was found with advancing gestational age, with the highest and lowest values observed at 14 and 28 weeks, respectively. Based upon application in a separate test population of 1361 normal fetuses, a threshold of ± 1 SD maximized identification of misleading BPDs due to altered head shape.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
B. Hearn-Stebbins
Normal Fetal Growth Assessment: A Review of Literature and Current Practice
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, July 1, 1995; 11(4): 176 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.