Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1989;74:289-294
© 1989 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LINDSAY, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by KLEIN, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LINDSAY, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by KLEIN, L.

Routine Antepartum Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Screening in an Inner-City Population

MICHAEL K. LINDSAY, MD, HERBERT B. PETERSON, MD, TERRY I. FENG, MD, BARBARA A. SLADE, MD, SUSAN WILLIS, MSN and LUELLA KLEIN, MD

From the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection occurs disproportionately among inner-city minority women of reproductive age. Once pregnant, these women have a high risk of delivering infants with perinatally acquired infection. Identification and counseling of HIV-infected parturients may be an effective means of preventing perinatal HIV infection. Few data are available on the seroprevalence of HIV infection in the inner-city population or on the clinical and demographic determinants of risk. To better characterize HIV infection in inner-city parturients in Atlanta, we conducted routine antepartum screening for HIV antibody in 3472 women. Ten (2.8 per 1000) were seropositive on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot testing. Four women were seropositive on repeat ELISA but negative on Western blot. Four infected women had had heterosexual contact with a person at risk for HIV, three were intravenous drug users, one had possibly become infected via blood transfusion, and two had no apparent risk factors. Seven of the seropositive women had no selfidentified risk factors and would not have been identified if screening had been performed using current Centers for Disease Control criteria. Ten percent of the women screened had self-identified risk factors for HIV infection and were seronegative. Ninety-six percent of women consented to HIV testing. These data suggest that inner-city parturients in Atlanta are at risk for HIV infection and that routine antepartum HIV screening can be performed provided the appropriate multidisciplinary team is in place for counseling and follow-up. (Obstet Gynecol 74:289, 1989)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. Chou, A. K. Smits, L. H. Huffman, R. Fu, and P. T. Korthuis
Prenatal Screening for HIV: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, July 5, 2005; 143(1): 38 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.