Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1989;74:277-280
© 1989 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Besinger, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, T. R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Besinger, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, T. R. B.

Doppler recordings of fetal movement: Clinical correlation with real-time ultrasound

Richard E. Besinger, MD and Timothy R. B. Johnson, MD

From the Fetal Assessment Center, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

Processed Doppler signals can be used to detect fetal movements during antepartum fetal heart rate (FHR) testing. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the ability of a commercially available Doppler system, the Toitu Fetal Actocardiograph MT-320, to detect and discriminate various fetal activities during routine antepartum FHR testing. Simultaneous visualization with real-time ultrasound allowed correlation of isolated and complex fetal activities with the processed actograph signals. This apparatus was able to detect 95.9% of all major fetal movements observed, 94.3% of isolated fetal movements, 95.6% of isolated spinal flexion- extension, 97.1% of isolated rolling movements, and 100% of all multiple (P < .001) fetal movements. Based on the amplitude (P < .0001) and duration of the isolated actograph signals, it was possible to discriminate among fetal limb movements (mean amplitude 87.3 units, mean duration less than 2.0 seconds), spinal flexion-extension movements (66.3 units, 14.8 seconds), and rolling movements (43.8 units, 22.1 seconds). The routine detection of fetal breathing, hand movements, and rapid eye movements appears to be beyond the sensitivity of this particular apparatus. The ability to evaluate fetal activity reliably may be clinically useful during routine antepartum FHR testing.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.