Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1989;74:262-266
© 1989 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dans, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by King, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dans, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by King, T. M.

Improving a university hospital obstetric clinic: Better but not best

Peter E. Dans, MD, Timothy R. B. Johnson, MD and Theodore M. King, MD, PhD

From the Office of Medical Practice Evaluation, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

The Obstetric Clinic at the Johns Hopkins Hospital was evaluated on four occasions during the past 8 years. In 1980, there were major inefficiencies because of a block patient appointment system and late physician arrival. Clinic goals were largely undefined. The institution of a staggered appointment system, the naming of an on-site physician director who encouraged physicians to arrive on time, and the delegation of specific responsibilities to the nurses and clerks resulted in improved patient transit time. In 1981, 72% of patients had left by 2 hours after their arrival, compared with only 4% in 1980. The departure of the physician director was associated with considerable back-sliding in patient transit time because of late physician arrival. There was a corresponding decrease in appointment-keeping from 90 to 78%. Patients were satisfied with their care but very dissatisfied with the waiting time. The return of the physician director and the reaffirmation of the roles of nurses and clerks reversed much of the backsliding. Our study suggests that improvements in teaching-hospital obstetric clinics are difficult to sustain without strong leadership. We believe that further improvement will require a major reorganization of ambulatory care for women. The feasibility of establishing a comprehensive program based on a group practice model is currently being studied.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.