Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1989;74:98-101
© 1989 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRONSTEEN, R.
Right arrow Articles by BOTTOMS, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BRONSTEEN, R.
Right arrow Articles by BOTTOMS, S.

Classification of Twins and Neonatal Morbidity

RICHARD BRONSTEEN, MD, GREGORY GOYERT, MD and SIDNEY BOTTOMS, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hutzel Hospital/Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan

Abstract

Prematurity is the most significant determinant of neonatal morbidity among twins, but the relative importance of other factors is unclear. We compared the prognostic value of intrauterine growth retardation, discordancy, and other classifications in 131 consecutive sets of surviving twins. A four-factor model for neonatal morbidity was developed from 161 potential outcome measures. Individual evaluation of each twin for intrauterine growth retardation using singleton growth curves was more effective than discordancy and other classifications in predicting neonatal morbidity. Our findings suggest that evaluation of twin growth should concentrate on individual twin growth rather than discordancy. These results also speak against interpreting growth curves based on twins in the same way as growth curves based on singletons; it is apparent that the frequency of growth retardation with associated neonatal morbidity is increased among twins.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
M-B Bengtson, T Ronning, M H Vatn, and J R Harris
Irritable bowel syndrome in twins: genes and environment
Gut, December 1, 2006; 55(12): 1754 - 1759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
R. C. Amaru, M. C. Bush, R. L. Berkowitz, R. H. Lapinski, and S. Gaddipati
Is Discordant Growth in Twins an Independent Risk Factor for Adverse Neonatal Outcome?
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2004; 103(1): 71 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
P. R. GERNT, J. G. MAULDIN, R. B. NEWMAN, and V. L. DURKALSKI
Sonographic Prediction of Twin Birth Weight Discordance
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2001; 97(1): 53 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Ferrazzani, A. Merola, S. De Carolis, B. Carducci, G. Paradisi, and A. Caruso
Birth weight in pre-eclamptic and normotensive twin pregnancies: an analysis of discordance and growth restriction
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2000; 15(1): 210 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.