Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1989;74:85-87
© 1989 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KILPATRICK, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by LAROS, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KILPATRICK, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by LAROS, R. K., Jr

Characteristics of Normal Labor

SARAH J. KILPATRICK, MD, PhD and RUSSELL K. LAROS, Jr, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco

Abstract

The length of the first and second stages of labor was evaluated in 6991 women with singleton gestations at 37–42 weeks with vertex presentation. All patients delivered spontaneously without the use of oxytocin. Four study groups were created based on parity and whether conduction anesthesia was used. The mean lengths and limits (95th percentile) for the first stage of labor, respectively, were as follows: nulliparas: no anesthesia—8.1 and 16.6 hours, conduction anesthesia—10.2 and 19.0 hours; multiparas: no anesthesia—5.7 and 12.5 hours, conduction anesthesia—7.4 and 14.9 hours. Similar data for the second stage were as follows: nulliparas: no anesthesia—54 and 132 minutes, conduction anesthesia—79 and 185 minutes; multiparas: no anesthesia—19 and 61 minutes, conduction anesthesia—45 and 131 minutes. These statistical parameters are useful for defining when a labor becomes abnormal and intervention should be considered.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
S. P. MARK, M. S. CROUGHAN-MINIHANE, and S. J. KILPATRICK
Chorioamnionitis and Uterine Function
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2000; 95(6): 909 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.