Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1989;73:405-409
© 1989 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by STOVALL, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by LING, F. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by STOVALL, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by LING, F. W.

Endometrial Sampling Prior to Hysterectomy

THOMAS G. STOVALL, MD, STEVEN K. SOLOMON, MD and FRANK W. LING, MD

From the Division of Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee

Abstract

Many gynecologists use routine endometrial sampling prior to hysterectomy to detect an unsuspected endometrial carcinoma. Gynecologists who formerly performed uterine curettage under anesthesia before hysterectomy now often use an outpatient endometrial sampling technique. Although safe, this procedure is complicated by discomfort, cost, and the risk of infection or uterine perforation. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of pre-hysterectomy endometrial sampling. Between 1981-1985, 619 patients undergoing hysterectomy had preoperative endometrial sampling using Vabra aspiration, the Novak curette, or D&C. The endometrial sampling histology was compared with that in the hysterectomy specimen. There were 30 instances in which the endometrial sampling failed to identify either endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma. In the two cases of endometrial carcinoma, D&C was the sampling method used. The findings of this study indicate that these three techniques of endometrial sampling are equal in their diagnostic capabilities. The results confirm the need for biopsy in patients with postmenopausal bleeding or with abnormal uterine bleeding at age 35 years or older. Our findings do not support routine endometrial sampling prior to hysterectomy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
G Michail, A Karahaliou, S Skiadopoulos, C Kalogeropoulou, G Terzis, I Boniatis, L Costaridou, G Kourounis, and G Panayiotakis
Texture analysis of perimenopausal and post-menopausal endometrial tissue in grayscale transvaginal ultrasonography
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2007; 80(956): 609 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.