Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1988;72:59-62
© 1988 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FORTUNATO, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by GUZICK, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FORTUNATO, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by GUZICK, D. S.

External Cephalic Version With Tocolysis: Factors Associated With Success

STEPHEN J. FORTUNATO, MD, LANE J. MERCER, MD and DAVID S. GUZICK, MD, PhD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Dallas, Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas

Abstract

Data were collected prospectively on factors that might affect the success or failure of external cephalic version, using a protocol including fetal monitoring, ultrasound, tocolysis, and external version after 37 weeks' gestation. Patients were accepted into the protocol whether or not risk factors for failure were present. Sixty-seven patients were admitted to the study and 40 (60%) underwent successful version. Using X2 analysis, we found that failure of external version was significantly associated with obesity, descent of the breech into the pelvis, decreased fluid, and fetal back positioned posteriorly. Thirteen women were in active labor; this had no effect on the success rate providing that descent had not occurred. Two factors, descent of the breech into the pelvis and posterior position of the fetal back, had an independent effect on success after controlling for other variables.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
C. F. Weiniger, Y. Ginosar, U. Elchalal, E. Sharon, M. Nokrian, and Y. Ezra
External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation With or Without Spinal Analgesia in Nulliparous Women at Term: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2007; 110(6): 1343 - 1350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
G. A. AISENBREY, V. A. CATANZARITE, and C. NELSON
External Cephalic Version: Predictors of Success
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 1999; 94(5): 783 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.