Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1984;63:714-718
© 1984 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DAY, N E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DAY, N E

Effect of Cervical Cancer Screening in Scandinavia

N E DAY, PhD

From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon France

Abstract

Mass screening programs for cancer of the cervix were introduced at different times and to different extents in the Scandinavian countries. Iceland and Finland introduced nationwide screening programs in the early 1960s. Ten years after their introduction, marked reductions in incidence and mortality of invasive cervical cancer were observed, seen specifically in the age groups to which screening was targeted. In Sweden and Denmark, mass screening was introduced on a county basis, and changes in incidence and death rates from cervical cancer were recorded which reflected the degree to which organized mass screening had been introduced. These data demonstrate that mass screening scheduled every two to five years can reduce the incidence of invasive cervical cancer by 80%. No evidence is available from Scandinavia that more frequent screening reduces the risk further.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
M. Gilson, A. Desai, G. Cardoza-Favarato, P. Vroman, and J. A. Thornton
Does gel affect cytology or comfort in the screening papanicolaou smear?
J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2006; 19(4): 340 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. G. Zapka, S. H. Taplin, L. I. Solberg, and M. M. Manos
A Framework for Improving the Quality of Cancer Care: The Case of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2003; 12(1): 4 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. A. Cannistra and J. M. Niloff
Cancer of the Uterine Cervix
N. Engl. J. Med., April 18, 1996; 334(16): 1030 - 1037.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.