Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Obstetrics & Gynecology 1984;63:285-290
© 1984 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HEMSELL, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by HEMSELL, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HEMSELL, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by HEMSELL, P. G.

Single-Dose Cefoxitin Prophylaxis for Premenopausal Women Undergoing Vaginal Hysterectomy

DAVID L. HEMSELL, MD, MOLLY L. HEARD, RA, BRENDA J. NOBLES and PATRICIA G. HEMSELL, RA

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Dallas, Southwestern Medical School, Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, Texas.

A prospective randomized blinded study was conducted comparing a single 2-g preoperative dose of cefoxitin with three 2-g doses of cefoxitin over 12 hours given to premenopausal women scheduled for vaginal hysterectomy in Parkland Memorial Hospital. The incidence of major pelvic infection in 58 women given one dose was 1.7%, and it was 3.7% for 54 women given three doses. The mean hospital stay (4.5 days) was similar for both regimens; for those who developed major infection it was eight days. More aerobic bacteria with altered species dominance and fewer anaerobic bacteria were recovered from the vaginal cuff at discharge from the hospital when compared with those recovered from the endocervix preoperatively. There was a trend toward increasing minimal inhibitory concentrations to cefoxitin in bacteria isolated after surgery, which was more frequent in women given three doses. There was not a statistically significant intergroup difference in the recovery of bacteria resistant to cefoxitin in vitro after surgery. A single preoperative dose of cefoxitin was as effective in preventing major infection as were three perioperative doses, while providing other real and theoretic benefits.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.