Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1984;63:241-245
© 1984 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krebs, H.-B
Right arrow Articles by Helmkamp, B F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krebs, H.-B
Right arrow Articles by Helmkamp, B F.

Transverse periumbilical incision in the massively obese patient

Hans-B Krebs, MD and B Frederick Helmkamp, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Strong Memorial Hospital, The University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York

A periumbilical transverse incision placed above or no more than 5 cm below the external portion of the umbilicus was used for pelvic surgery in 21 massively obese women with a large dependent panniculus. Five patients (24%) had wound complications of varying degrees, including one evisceration. Other complications included postoperative fever (62%), urinary tract infection (19%), respiratory complications (10%), paralytic ileus (5%), partial small bowel obstruction (5%), and pulmonary embolus (5%). There was no operative mortality in the series. The periumbilical approach gives good exposure during surgery and—in the patient population studied—is preferable to other incisions for pelvic surgery. It circumvents the contaminated suprasymphyseal problem area beneath the pannicular fold and avoids the thick, edematous, dependent portion of the panniculus, which must be retracted upward for low and high suprasymphyseal transverse and midline abdominal incisions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
E. L. Eisenhauer, K. A. Wypych, B. J. Mehrara, C. Lawson, D. S. Chi, R. R. Barakat, and N. R. Abu-Rustum
Comparing Surgical Outcomes in Obese Women Undergoing Laparotomy, Laparoscopy, or Laparotomy With Panniculectomy for the Staging of Uterine Malignancy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2007; 14(8): 2384 - 2391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.