Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1984;63:201-204
© 1984 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by OTT, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by DOYLE, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by OTT, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by DOYLE, S.

Ultrasonic Diagnosis of Altered Fetal Growth by Use of a Normal Ultrasonic Fetal Weight Curve

WILLIAM J. OTT, MD and SUE DOYLE, RN

From the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, and the Department of Perinatal Ultrasound, St. Mary's Health Center, St. Louis, Missouri

Abstract

A previously developed normal ultrasonic fetal weight curve was used for antenatal diagnosis of altered fetal growth in 595 patients who had undergone real-time ultrasound examination within 72 hours before birth. Fetal weight was estimated using biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference and plotted on the normal curve. The diagnosis of small for gestational age (SGA) or large for gestational age (LGA) was based on whether the ultrasonic weight fell below or above the normal limits. After delivery, infants were classified as SGA, LGA, or average for gestational age (AGA) by birth weight, and the postnatal diagnosis was compared to the antenatal ultrasound diagnosis. The sensitivity of the technique for the diagnosis of SGA infants was 89.9%; for LGA it was 73.5%. The overall specificity of the technique was 79.8%.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.