HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by FUJII, T. Articles by RICHART, R. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by FUJII, T. Articles by RICHART, R. M.

Human Papillomavirus Infection and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Histopathology and DNA Content

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hiroshima University School of Medicine, Hiroshima, Japan; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Division of Obstetric and Gynecologic Pathology, New York, New York; and the Department of Pathology, University of California, Center for Health Sciences, Los Angeles, California.

Abstract

To evaluate the reliability of diagnostic criteria for separating intraepithelial squamous lesions into low- and high-risk categories, 25 lesions of the cervix were diagnosed as flat condyloma, atypical immature metaplasia, or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with koilocytosis based on well-defined histologic criteria. The presumption was that flat condyloma and atypical immature metaplasia would be diploid/polyploid as compared to low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, which should be aneuploid. Using the major histologic parameter of the presence or absence of abnormal mitoses to distinguish the low- and high-risk lesions, it was found that all of five typical flat condylomas were diploid/polyploid and seven of eight atypical immature metaplastic lesions were diploid/polyploid; 11 of 13 cervical intraepithelial neoplasms with koilocytosis, however, were aneuploid. An additional histologic parameter of anisocytosis (variation in nuclear size) appeared much less reliable for segregating these lesions than the nature of the mitoses. Lesions for which ploidy values were particularly difficult to predict were extremely well-differentiated koilocytotic lesions with occasional abnormal mitoses. Whether these are true polyploid lesions in which the abnormal mitoses are a response to the virus, or whether they are very early aneuploid lesions that cannot be confirmed by microspectrophotometry, remains to be determined.