Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1983;62:582-586
© 1983 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BARRETT, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by PETERS, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BARRETT, R. J., II
Right arrow Articles by PETERS, W. A., III

Pregnancy Following Urinary Diversion

ROLLAND J. BARRETT, II, MD and WILLIAM A. PETERS, III, MD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Abstract

Five pregnancies were cared for in four patients who had undergone ureterosigmoid anastomosis or ileal conduit urinary diversions. The most common complication of pregnancy was urinary tract infection, ranging from asymptomatic bacteriuria to pyelonephritis. Significant obstruction of the diverted urinary tract failed to occur during gestation or delivery. Laboratory and radiographic studies demonstrated maintenance of baseline renal function. Offspring delivered showed appropriate growth for gestational age without associated anomalies. The authors' data and a review of the literature suggest that vaginal delivery is safe, and cesarean section may be reserved for obstetric indications. Pregnancy is not contraindicated after urinary diversion.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.