Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1983;62:236-240
© 1983 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HILL, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by LAVIN, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HILL, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by LAVIN, J. P.

Blood Ordering in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Recommendations for the Type and Screen

STEPHEN T. HILL, MD and JUSTIN P. LAVIN, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akron City Hospital, Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Akron, Ohio

Abstract

The number of units of blood preoperatively crossmatched to the number of units transfused was studied retrospectively in patients undergoing four common obstetric and gynecologic procedures. Associated medical problems and the timing of and reasons for transfusions were evaluated. Patients with risk factors associated with an increased incidence of required transfusion were identified. Based on these results, a type and screen method for preoperative blood ordering is recommended for most patients undergoing cesarean section, abdominal hysterectomy, and vaginal hysterectomy. Using this method, sera are preoperatively tested for unexpected antibodies and ABO/Rh typing is done. If the antibody screen is negative, crossmatching is not done. Should a transfusion be ordered, crossmatching can be done in 20 minutes, or type-specific blood can be available after a 15-second saline spin. Through application of the type and screen method, a substantial savings in money and laboratory personnel time can be expected without compromising patient care.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.