Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1983;62:213-217
© 1983 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LARSSON, G.
Right arrow Articles by GRUNDSELL, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LARSSON, G.
Right arrow Articles by GRUNDSELL, H.

A Comparison of Complications of Laser and Cold Knife Conization

GÖRAN LARSSON, MD, BO GULLBERG, PhD and HANS GRUNDSELL, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, and the South Swedish Regional Tumor Registry, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden

Abstract

A comparison was made of intraoperative and postoperative complications of laser conization and cold knife conization. Of 428 women hospitalized for cold knife conization, 23.6% had one or more complications; 14.3% had postoperative hemorrhages, 6.8% had infections, and 4.7% suffered from stenosis. Two hundred sixteen women were hospitalized for laser conization; 5.1% of them suffered complications. Postoperative hemorrhages occurred in 2.8% and infections in 2.3%. No case of stenosis occurred. Laser conization as an outpatient procedure was undertaken in 240 women; 4.2% had complications. Postoperative hemorrhages occurred in only 2.5%, infections in 1.3%, and stenosis in 0.8%. Laser conization has the same complication rate as laser vaporization and can be safely performed on an outpatient basis, thereby reducing hospital costs.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
F. S. Billingsley and A. A. Kamat
Superiority of Electrocautery Over the Suture Method for Achieving Cervical Cone-Bed Hemostasis
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2004; 103(2): 401 - 402.
[Full Text]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. A. Kamat, P. Kramer, and A. P. Soisson
Superiority of Electrocautery Over the Suture Method for Achieving Cervical Cone Bed Hemostasis
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2003; 102(4): 726 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Hachisuga and T. Kawarabayashi
Histopathological analysis of laparoscopically treated ovarian endometriotic cysts with special reference to loss of follicles
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2002; 17(2): 432 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.