Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1983;62:160-165
© 1983 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CHERVENAK, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by HOBBINS, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CHERVENAK, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by HOBBINS, J. C.

Intrapartum External Version of the Second Twin

FRANK A. CHERVENAK, MD, ROBERT E. JOHNSON, MD, RICHARD L. BERKOWITZ, MD and JOHN C. HOBBINS, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale—New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, Connecticut

Abstract

Twenty-five external cephalic versions were attempted on 14 transverse and 11 breech malpositioned second twins. In ten of 14 (71%) transverse presentations and eight of 11 (73%) breech presentations, version was successful and resulted in subsequent vertex vaginal delivery. Successful version was not associated with parity, gestational age, or birth weight but was associated with mode of anesthesia and disparity in twin size. Among the 25 attempted versions, seven (28%) had one-minute and two (8%) had five-minute Apgar scores below 7. Analysis by birth weight and mode of delivery is presented. Time interval between delivery of twins had no association with outcome. One neonatal death occurred in a 28-week, 1100-g infant. The authors believe that external version is useful in the management of the second twin who has an abnormal presentation, and that routine cesarean section is not always necessary. Further investigation, especially at lower birth weights, is necessary to confirm the safety and efficacy of this method of management.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.