Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1981;58:678-684
© 1981 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WINIKOFF, B.
Right arrow Articles by DEBROVNER, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WINIKOFF, B.
Right arrow Articles by DEBROVNER, C. H.

Anthropometric Determinants of Birth Weight

BEVERLY WINIKOFF, MD, MPH and CHARLES H. DEBROVNER, MD

Abstract

The correlation of maternal and paternal physical characteristics to the weight of the newborn infant was investigated. It was found that a different anthropomorphic variable best explained the outcome in each group when mothers were divided by weight for height. In women of low weight for height, weight gain was most significantly associated with birth weight (P<.01); and in women of intermediate weight for height, the significant variable was maternal prepregnancy weight (P<.01); in women of high weight for height the outcome was best explained by maternal height (P<.05). The model accounted for 17,21, and 32% of the variance in birth weight in the 3 weight-for-height groups, respectively. It appears that the relative value of genetic and environmental factors may be different depending on the body type of the mother. It is postulated that other genetic and environmental factors, including smoking, alcohol ingestion, and exact gestational age, may be of significance. The conclusions of this study differ from those of previously reported studies. Possible explanations include variable population homogeneity and different socioeconomic groups studied as well as the obscuring of biologically significant variables if outcomes in subjects with different body types are not analyzed separately.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
L. Touger, H. C. Looker, J. Krakoff, R. S. Lindsay, V. Cook, and W. C. Knowler
Early Growth in Offspring of Diabetic Mothers
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2005; 28(3): 585 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. Orskou, T. B. Henriksen, U. Kesmodel, and N. J. Secher
Maternal Characteristics and Lifestyle Factors and the Risk of Delivering High Birth Weight Infants
Obstet. Gynecol., July 1, 2003; 102(1): 115 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.