Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1981;58:669-677
© 1981 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FOREMAN, H.
Right arrow Articles by SCHLESSELMAN, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FOREMAN, H.
Right arrow Articles by SCHLESSELMAN, S.

Intrauterine Device Usage and Fetal Loss

HARRY FOREMAN, MD, BRUCE V. STADEL, MPH, MD and SARAH SCHLESSELMAN, MS

Abstract

The effect of intrauterine device (IUD) usage on the occurrence of fetal loss after the first trimester of pregnancy was investigated in the Women's Health Study, a multicenter case-control study of the relationship between IUD usage and the occurrence of serious gynecologic and obstetric disorders that was carried out in 16 US hospitals between 1976 and 1978. In this study, 539 cases of second-trimester fetal loss were compared with 336 matched controls. It was found that IUD use prior to conception did not increase the risk of second-trimester fetal loss. Also, if an IUD was in place at conception but was removed during the first trimester of pregnancy, the risk of second-trimester fetal loss was not increased. However, among women with an. IUD in place at conception that was not removed during the first trimester of pregnancy, the risk of second-trimester fetal loss was increased tenfold (relative to the risk among women not having an IUD in place at conception). This increase in risk was much greater for septic second-trimester fetal loss (relative risk approximately equal to 26, 95% confidence interval 6 to 108) than for nonsrptic fetal loss (relative risk approximately equal to 3, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 22). From this study and from ancillary data concerning IUD usage and failure rates, it is estimated that about 600 cases of second-trimester fetal loss (septic and nonseptic combined) occur annually in the United States as a consequence of an IU of pregnancy. An IUD in place at the beginning of the second trimester of pregnancy also appears to increase the risk of third-trimester fetal loss, but the magnitude of this increase is uncertain.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.