Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1981;58:10-16
© 1981 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MARCH, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by MISHELL, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MARCH, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by MISHELL, D. R., Jr

Feedback Effects of Estradiol and Progesterone upon Gonadotropin and Prolactin Release

CHARLES M. MARCH, MD, RICHARD P. MARRS, MD, UWE GOEBELSMANN, MD and DANIEL R. MISHELL, Jr, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, and Women's Hospital, Los Angeles County-USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

Abstract

The relationship between estradiol- and progesterone-mediated gonadotropin release and steroid-induced changes in prolactin levels was investigated in an improved human experimental model. Three women who had undergone bilateral ovariectomy were studied after they had received a subcutaneous implant of one 25-mg estradiol (E2) pellet. Serum E2levels remained between 60 and 125 pg/ml, and serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations were within the normal or slightly elevated range. Serum prolactin (PRL) levels were normal. Each woman received intramuscular injections of gradually increasing doses of estradiol benzoate (E2B) alone and in combination with progesterone (P) in 7 different experiments. An E2B-induced rise in E2levels comparable to that observed at midcycle elicited a clearly defined LH surge but no change in FSH and PRL. Rising E2concentrations followed by increasing P levels caused LH and FSH release but no change in PRL. When only P was administered or when serum P levels rose concomitantly with E2levels, PRL and gonadotropin levels remained unchanged. These data indicate that a surge of E2similar to that observed at midcycle triggers an acute release of LH only. Moreover, P levels commensurate with those found at midcycle facilitate an E2-mediated LH release and induce a concomitant peak in FSH. The lack of a significant increase in PRL levels suggests that different mechanisms are responsible for the pituitary release of PRL and gonadotropins.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.