Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1978;52:410-414
© 1978 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MORRISON, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by BUCOVAZ, E T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MORRISON, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by BUCOVAZ, E T

The L/S Ratio and Shake Test in Normal and Abnormal Pregnancies

JOHN C. MORRISON, MD, FACOG, W D WHYBREW, MS and E T BUCOVAZ, PhD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal/fetal Medicine, and the Department of Biochemistry at the University of Tennessee Center for the Health Sciences, Memphis, Tennessee

Abstract

The "foam" or "shake" test for fetal lung maturity has been shown by many investigators to be a rapid, reliable, and reproducible method of assessing fetal lung maturity when compared to the lecithin/sphingomyelin (L/S) ratio in normal pregnancies. In abnormal pregnancies, however, the accuracy of both tests in predicting respiratory problems has been questioned. This study shows the results of both procedures in a large group of normal (279) pregnancies, as well as in patients with significant maternal and/or fetal disease (489). In the normal patients, a positive shake test did not correlate with the L/S ratio in 4% of the cases, whereas a negative shake test compared favorably with the L/S ratio in 88% of the cases tested. If certain diseases were present, however, there was a disparity of 13-24% when these two tests were compared. When these procedures were used to predict the occurrence of RDS in the normal patients they were accurate. In the pregnancies complicated by maternal and/or fetal disease, however, the accuracy rate fell for both the L/S ratio and the shake test. In this group, the false-negative results appeared to remain stable while the false-positive rate demonstrated a significant increase. From these data, the shake test appears to predict RDS very well in normal patients. Unfortunately, because the number of errors increases significantly for both assays in abnormal patients, the tests should be used in conjunction with other tests if severe maternal or fetal disease is present.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.