Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1978;52:285-288
© 1978 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WLADIMIROFF, J.
Right arrow Articles by WALLENBURG, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WLADIMIROFF, J.
Right arrow Articles by WALLENBURG, H.

Ultrasonic Diagnosis of the Large-for-Dates Infant

JW WLADIMIROFF, MD, PhD, CA BLOEMSMA, MD and HCS WALLENBURG, MD, PhD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the Academic Hospital Rotterdam-Dijkzigl, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Data on consecutive measurement of fetal biparietal diameter (BPD) and fetal chest area in 42 normal weight infants (birthweight IO-9Oth percentile) and 30 large-for-dates (birthweight above the 90th percentile) are presented. Pregnancy duration varied from 32 to 40 weeks. In the normal weight group fetal BPD and chest area were above the 95th percentile of the normal curve in 7% and 5% of the cases; in the large-for-dates group the figures were 7% and 47%. Head to chest ratio fell below the fifth percentile of the normal curve in 53% of the large-for-dates against only 2% of the normal weight infants. In the detection of the large-for-dates infant ultrasonic measurement of fetal chest area appears to be superior to ultrasonic measurement of fetal BPD.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.