Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1978;52:189-192
© 1978 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HERSHEY, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by QUILLIGAN, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HERSHEY, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by QUILLIGAN, E. J.

Extraabdominal Uterine Exteriorization at Cesarean Section

DOUGLAS W. HERSHEY, MD and EDWARD J. QUILLIGAN, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Los Angeles County—University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

Abstract

A series of 386 consecutive cesarean sections is presented in which postpartum uteri were randomly exteriorized or left in situ for suturing the hysterotomy incision in an attempt to evaluate differences in morbidity. Both groups were shown to be similar with respect to overall morbidity, although a high-morbidity subgroup exhibiting increased blood loss was defined and included significantly more patients in the noneventrated group. Emesis occurred in 4 (3.4%) patients in the eventrated group and was directly related to fundal traction under regional anesthesia. Although a larger prospective series is needed to evaluate more serious morbidity, the data presented suggest that uterine eventration at cesarean section is not to be condemned.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
I. C. Coutinho, M. M. Ramos de Amorim, L. Katz, and A. A. Bandeira de Ferraz
Uterine Exteriorization Compared With In Situ Repair at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2008; 111(3): 639 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. Siddiqui, E. Goldszmidt, S. Fallah, J. Kingdom, R. Windrim, and J. C. A. Carvalho
Complications of Exteriorized Compared With In Situ Uterine Repair at Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2007; 110(3): 570 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.