|
|
||||||||
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Los Angeles County—University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
Abstract
A series of 386 consecutive cesarean sections is presented in which postpartum uteri were randomly exteriorized or left in situ for suturing the hysterotomy incision in an attempt to evaluate differences in morbidity. Both groups were shown to be similar with respect to overall morbidity, although a high-morbidity subgroup exhibiting increased blood loss was defined and included significantly more patients in the noneventrated group. Emesis occurred in 4 (3.4%) patients in the eventrated group and was directly related to fundal traction under regional anesthesia. Although a larger prospective series is needed to evaluate more serious morbidity, the data presented suggest that uterine eventration at cesarean section is not to be condemned.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. C. Coutinho, M. M. Ramos de Amorim, L. Katz, and A. A. Bandeira de Ferraz Uterine Exteriorization Compared With In Situ Repair at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2008; 111(3): 639 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Siddiqui, E. Goldszmidt, S. Fallah, J. Kingdom, R. Windrim, and J. C. A. Carvalho Complications of Exteriorized Compared With In Situ Uterine Repair at Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2007; 110(3): 570 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |