Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1978;52:63-66
© 1978 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MUSICH, J. R
Right arrow Articles by BEHRMAN, S J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MUSICH, J. R
Right arrow Articles by BEHRMAN, S J.

Obstetric Outcome Before and After Metroplasty in Women With Uterine Anomalies

JOHN R MUSICH, MD and S JAN BEHRMAN, MD, FACOG, FRCOG

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Abstract

A review of 49 patients with uterine anomalies was made to determine the relationship of anomalies to infertility, to obstetric outcome, and to indications for surgical reconstruction (metroplasty). For 41 of the 49 patients with obstetric histories, the overall pregnancy wastage was 72%, with bicornuate and septate patients having 85 to 90% wastage. The 28% of pregnancies that were successful were largely accounted for by patients with didelphic anomalies. It was found that infertility was an uncommon problem in these patients and it should rarely be an indication for metroplasty. In 21 patients properly selected for metroplasty because of repeat pregnancy loss, the obstetric outcome improved from 7% successful pregnancies before surgery to 75% postoperative!y. Patients with septate or bicornuate anomalies were found to be poor obstetric performers and likely candidates for repair, while patients with didelphic anomalies achieved obstetric satisfaction without surgical intervention.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. N. Troiano and S. M. McCarthy
Mullerian Duct Anomalies: Imaging and Clinical Issues
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 19 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.