Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1974;43:475-479
© 1974 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GOLDSTEIN, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GOLDSTEIN, D. P.

Prevention of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease by Use of Actinomycin D in Molar Pregnancies

DONALD PETER GOLDSTEIN, MD, FACOG, FACS

From the New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School; The Trophoblastic Tumor Service, Boston Hospital for Women (Lyingin Division); and The Brigham-Harvard Reproductive Biology Unit, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

Actinomycin D, 12 µg/kg/day, for 5 consecutive days, was administered intravenously to 100 patients with molar pregnancy at the time of evacuation. A comparable group of 100 patients with molar pregnancy untreated at the time of evacuation was used as control. Proliferativc trophoblastic sequelae occurred in 2 patients in the treated group, in contrast to 16 patients in the untreated group. No cases of mctastatic trophoblastic disease (MTD) were encountered in the treated group, but 4 cases of MTD developed in untreated patients. Druginduced toxicity in the treated group was mild and transient. The use of actinomycin D prophylactically at the time of evacuation of molar pregnancy appears to eliminate MTD and substantially reduce the incidence of nonmetastatic trophoblastic disease (NMTD) with a wide margin of safety. Despite the safety and effectiveness of this technic, its use should be limited to special situations where the risk of developing trophoblastic disease is greater than normal or where adequate gonadotropin followup is unavailable.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.