Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Obstetrics & Gynecology 2008;111:1053-1057
© 2008 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laine, K.
Right arrow Articles by Pirhonen, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laine, K.
Right arrow Articles by Pirhonen, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hypertension and PIH

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Decreasing the Incidence of Anal Sphincter Tears During Delivery

Katariina Laine, MD1, Tiina Pirhonen, RN1, Rune Rolland, MD, PhD1 and Jouko Pirhonen, MD, PhD2

From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1Oestfold Trust Hospital, Fredrikstad, Norway; and 2Ullevaal University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate if an interventional program causes a decrease in the frequency of anal sphincter ruptures.

METHODS: A total of 12,369 vaginal deliveries between 2002 and March 2007 were enrolled in the interventional cohort study. Slowing the delivery of the infant’s head and instructing the mother not to push while the head is delivered was the intervention. Data were analyzed in relation to occurrence of anal sphincter tears.

RESULTS: The proportion of parturients with anal sphincter tears decreased significantly during the study period from 4.03% (285 of 7,069) to 1.17% (42 of 3,577) (P<.001). A similar decrease was observed for instrumental deliveries (from 16.26% to 4.90%; P<.001) and noninstrumental deliveries (from 2.70% to 0.72%; P<.001). Although the number of patients with fourth-degree anal sphincter ruptures from 2002 through 2004 was 10, 13, and 11 per year, respectively, there was just one fourth-degree anal sphincter rupture during the whole study period of 18 months (P<.001). The number of episiotomies increased from 13.9% (980 of 7,069) in the years 2002–2004, to 23.1% during the first 9 months of the intervention (416 of 1,776; P<.001), but decreased to 21.1% (381 of 1,801) during the last 9 months of the intervention.

CONCLUSION: As a result of this intervention the number of anal sphincter ruptures was reduced from 4.03% to 1.17%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.