HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplement: Appendix Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Subak, L. L. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Subak, L. L. Related Collections Urogynecology

High Costs of Urinary Incontinence Among Women Electing Surgery to Treat Stress Incontinence

From the Departments of ¹Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences and ²Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; ³Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Urology, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois; ⁴Department of Urology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; ⁵Department of Urology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan; ⁶Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; ⁷Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; ⁸National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland; ⁹Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; ¹⁰Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California; ¹¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; and ¹²New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate costs for incontinence management, health-related quality of life, and willingness to pay for incontinence improvement in women electing surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

METHODS: A total of 655 incontinent women enrolled in the Stress Incontinence Surgical Treatment Efficacy Trial, a randomized surgical trial. Baseline out-of-pocket costs for incontinence management were calculated by multiplying self-report of resources used (supplies, laundry, dry cleaning) by national resource costs ($2006). Health-related quality of life was estimated with the Health Utilities Index Mark 3. Participants estimated willingness to pay for 100% improvement in incontinence. Potential predictors of these outcomes were examined by using multivariable linear regression.

RESULTS: Mean age was 52±10 years, and mean number of weekly incontinence episodes was 22±21. Mean and median (25%, 75% interquartile range) estimated personal costs for incontinence management among all women were $14±$24 and $8 (interquartile range $3, $18) per week, and 617 (94%) women reported any cost. Costs increased significantly with incontinence frequency and mixed compared with stress incontinence. The mean and median Health Utilities Index Mark 3 scores were 0.73±0.25 and 0.84 (interquartile range 0.63, 0.92). Women were willing to pay a mean of $118±$132 per month for complete resolution of incontinence, and willingness to pay increased significantly with greater expected incontinence improvement, household income, and incontinent episode frequency.

CONCLUSION: Urinary incontinence is associated with substantial costs. Women spent nearly $750 per year out of pocket for incontinence management, had a significant decrement in quality of life, and were willing to pay nearly $1,400 per year for cure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III