Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2008;111:511-512
© 2008 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beckwith, A. W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beckwith, A. W.

CASE REPORTS

Persistent Pain After Hysteroscopic Sterilization With Microinserts

Andrew W. Beckwith, MD1

From the 1Department of Maternal and Child Health, Berkshire Medical Center, Pittsfield, Massachusetts.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hysteroscopic sterilization using tubal microinsert devices is an increasingly common method of contraception. Postprocedure pain is typically minimal and brief, adding to the popularity of this method. This report describes a case of intractable pain after placement of microinserts, ultimately requiring removal of the inserts.

CASE: A 31-year-old gravida 4 para 4 woman underwent an uncomplicated office hysteroscopic tubal occlusion for permanent birth control. Subsequent to the procedure, she had significant bilateral pelvic pain that failed all attempts at conservative management and required removal of the microinserts for pain relief.

CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic placement of tubal microinserts for sterilization may occasionally be associated with intractable pelvic pain requiring removal of the devices.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.