Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2008;111:378-384
© 2008 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hammoud, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Hatasaka, H.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hammoud, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Hatasaka, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow General gynecology

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Quantification of the Familial Contribution to Müllerian Anomalies

Ahmad O. Hammoud, MD1, Mark Gibson, MD1, C. Matthew Peterson, MD1, Richard A. Kerber, PhD2, Geraldine P. Mineau, PhD2 and Harry Hatasaka, MD1

From the 1Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah; and 2Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah-Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the familial contribution to müllerian anomalies and determine a possible inheritance pattern.

METHODS: Cases of müllerian anomalies, identified by International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes from January 1994 to March 2006, were collected from the largest hospital systems in the state of Utah. All records were subsequently matched to the Utah Population Database. Controls for this data set were randomly selected and matched based on birth year and gender. Highly specialized software "Kinship Analysis Tools (KAT)" was used for kinship analysis.

RESULTS: A total of 1,397 cases qualified for the final analysis. The kinship analysis tool identified 27 family clusters. The mean familial standardized incidence ratio was 3.43(P<.01). Using the adjusted "Population Attributable Risk," approximately 10% of cases of müllerian anomalies appear to be attributable to a familial association. The relative risk for müllerian anomalies in each class of kinship was as follows: first-degree relatives 11.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.42–24.82), parents/children 8.78 (95% CI 2.26–34.16), siblings 12.98 (95% CI 5.17–32.62), first cousins 1.44 (95% CI 0.76–2.76), and second cousins 1.30 (95% CI 0.96–1.77).

CONCLUSION: Müllerian anomalies have a strong familial aggregation and follow a polygenic and multifactorial inheritance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.