Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Obstetrics & Gynecology 2007;110:1256-1263
© 2007 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tollånes, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Skjaerven, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tollånes, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Skjaerven, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology/public health
Right arrow General obstetrics
Right arrow Infertility including ART

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Reduced Fertility After Cesarean Delivery

A Maternal Choice

Mette C. Tollånes, MD1,2, Kari K. Melve, MD, PhD1,2, Lorentz M. Irgens, MD, PhD1,2 and Rolv Skjaerven, PhD1,2

From the 1Section for Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Norway; and 2Medical Birth Registry of Norway, Locus of Registry Based Epidemiology, University of Bergen, Norway, and Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen Norway.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between mode of delivery and subsequent fertility.

METHODS: Deliveries registered in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway were linked to mothers through national identification numbers. The study population was 596,341 women who had their first delivery during 1967–1996, and who were followed up through 2003. We compared rates of continuation to a subsequent birth according to mode of previous delivery (cesarean compared with vaginal).

RESULTS: If the first child survived the first year of life, cesarean delivery was associated with a significantly reduced probability of a second birth (relative risk [RR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81–0.83 during 1967–1981, and RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.88–0.89 during 1982–1996). Following a stillbirth or an infant loss, the association was less strong during 1967–1981 (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89–0.97) and no longer significant during 1982–1996 (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97–1.03). A similar pattern was observed from the second to the third birth and in subgroup analyses of women with preeclampsia or breech presentation and in an obstetric low-risk group.

CONCLUSION: Cesarean delivery was more strongly associated with reduced fertility if the infant survived than if it was stillborn or died. This suggests that the reduced fertility was to a large degree voluntary and not related to the indication, nor to any physical consequence, of the cesarean delivery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.