Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Obstetrics & Gynecology 2007;110:820-826
© 2007 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tan, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Omar, S. Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tan, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Omar, S. Z.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Effect of Coital Activity on Onset of Labor in Women Scheduled for Labor Induction

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Peng Chiong Tan, MRCOG1, Choon Ming Yow, MBBS1 and Siti Zawiah Omar, MMed (O&G)1

From the 1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of coitus on the onset of labor.

METHODS: Women with a nonurgent labor induction at term were recruited. Women randomly assigned to the advised-coitus group were encouraged to have sex to promote the onset of labor. Controls were neither encouraged nor discouraged regarding coitus. Participants kept a coital and orgasm diary until delivery, and standard obstetric care was provided to both groups. Primary outcomes were reported coitus and spontaneous labor. Secondary outcomes included reported orgasms, initial Bishop score at the admission for induction, preterm rupture of membranes, use of dinoprostone, oxytocin, or epidural, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, cesarean delivery, maternal fever, and neonatal morbidity.

RESULTS: One hundred eight and 102 women randomly assigned to advised-coitus and control groups, respectively, were available for analysis. Women assigned to the advised-coitus group were more likely to report coital activity before delivery (60.2% compared with 39.6%, relative risk 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1–2.0; P=.004), but the spontaneous labor rate was no different (55.6% compared with 52.0%, relative risk 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.8–1.4; P=.68). Cesarean delivery rate and neonatal and other secondary outcomes were also not different.

CONCLUSION: Among women scheduled for labor induction who were advised to have sex, the increase in sexual activity did not increase the rate of spontaneous labor.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org, http://isrctn.org, ISRCTN17998696

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.