Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2007;110:318-324
© 2007 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dolan, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dolan, S. M.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The Contribution of Birth Defects to Preterm Birth and Low Birth Weight

Siobhan M. Dolan, MD, MPH1, Susan J. Gross, MD1, Irwin R. Merkatz, MD1, Vincent Faber, MA2, Lisa M. Sullivan, PhD3, Fergal D. Malone, MD1,4,6, T. Flint Porter, MD, MPH5, David A. Nyberg, MD6, Christine H. Comstock, MD7, Gary D. V. Hankins, MD8, Keith Eddleman, MD9, Lorraine Dugoff, MD10, Sabrina D. Craigo, MD11, Ilan Timor-Tritsch, MD12, Stephen R. Carr, MD13, Honor M. Wolfe, MD14, Diana W. Bianchi, MD15, Mary E. D'Alton, MD16 for the First and Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk (FASTER) Trial Research Consortium*

From 1Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York; 2DM-STAT, Inc, Malden, Massachusetts; 3Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; 4Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; 5University of Utah and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah; 6Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; 7William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan; 8University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; 9Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York; 10University of Colorado Health Sciences, Denver, Colorado; 11Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts; 12New York University Medical Center, New York, New York; 13Women and Infants' Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; 14University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 15Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts; and 16Columbia University, New York, New York.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of birth defects on preterm birth and low birth weight.

METHODS: Data from a large, prospective multi-center trial, the First and Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk (FASTER) Trial, were examined. All live births at more than 24 weeks of gestation with data on outcome and confounders were divided into two comparison groups: 1) those with a chromosomal or structural abnormality (birth defect) and 2) those with no abnormality detected in chromosomes or anatomy. Propensity scores were used to balance the groups, account for confounding, and reduce the bias of a large number of potential confounding factors in the assessment of the impact of a birth defect on outcome. Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied.

RESULTS: A singleton liveborn infant with a birth defect was 2.7 times more likely to be delivered preterm before 37 weeks of gestation (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3–3.2), 7.0 times more likely to be delivered preterm before 34 weeks (95% CI 5.5–8.9), and 11.5 times more likely to be delivered very preterm before 32 weeks (95% CI 8.7–15.2). A singleton liveborn with a birth defect was 3.6 times more likely to have low birth weight at less than 2,500 g (95% CI 3.0–4.3) and 11.3 times more likely to be very low birth weight at less than 1,500 g (95% CI 8.5–15.1).

CONCLUSION: Birth defects are associated with preterm birth and low birth weight after controlling for multiple confounding factors, including shared risk factors and pregnancy complications, using propensity scoring adjustment in multivariable regression analysis. The independent effects of risk factors on perinatal outcomes such as preterm birth and low birth weight, usually complicated by numerous confounding factors, may benefit from the application of this methodology, which can be used to minimize bias and account for confounding. Furthermore, this suggests that clinical and public health interventions aimed at preventing birth defects may have added benefits in preventing preterm birth and low birth weight.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
G. K. Swamy, T. Ostbye, and R. Skjaerven
Association of Preterm Birth With Long-term Survival, Reproduction, and Next-Generation Preterm Birth
JAMA, March 26, 2008; 299(12): 1429 - 1436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.