Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2007;110:169-173
© 2007 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wall, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wall, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ethics
Right arrow Medical education
Right arrow Personal Perspectives/Human Interest

CURRENT COMMENTARIES

The High Cost of Free Lunch

L. Lewis Wall, MD, DPhil1 and Douglas Brown, PhD2

From the 1Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Anthropology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri; and 2Barnes-Jewish Hospital Ethics Program, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri.

Most physicians deny their professional integrity can be "bought" by something as trivial as a cup of coffee or a free lunch. In this paper, we review the social science literature arguing that "gifting" physicians in this way is, in fact, a highly successful method of boosting drug sales. Unlike ordinary consumer goods, the sale of prescription drugs does not take place directly between the producer and the consumer; rather, prescription drug sales are mediated by the physician who writes the script for the medication. Pharmaceutical sales practices are geared toward influencing physician drug recognition so that, when prescriptions are written, their drug is the first one that comes to mind. Even small gifts produce in their recipients a disproportionately powerful willingness to reciprocate in some manner. The simple act of providing food has been shown to make any message more palatable and more likely to be favorably received. We argue that physician prescribing habits should be based upon careful consideration of what medication is really in the patient’s best clinical interests, not on who most recently provided the doctor with a free lunch.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
E. P. Frohlich
The High Cost of Free Lunch
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2007; 110(4): 931 - 931.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
W. A. Campbell
The High Cost of Free Lunch
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2007; 110(4): 931 - 932.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
D. A. Randall
The High Cost of Free Lunch
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2007; 110(4): 932 - 932.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.